At 15:35 10/31/2000 +0900, TAMURA Kent wrote: > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop > >Add IBM implementation, and fill "Y" for all items, please. Done. A couple of questions, the first of which is mine, and the latter is something Boyer asked: 1. Is the requirement with respect to parsing and relative-URI-ns (reporting it as an error and not expanding) already implemented in the parser, or logic you had to add on for the time being? 2. <Boyer>One of the final editorial tweaks that Joseph asked me to make was to amend the beginning of section 2.1 to make it clear that document subsetting and node-set input meant the same thing. When I say node-set input is recommended (as opposed to required), I'm saying that a conformant implementation should but is not required to do document subsetting as described in Section 2.4 and exemplified in Section 3.7. Since ... you have working code for example 3.7, I am just writing to ask whether this does indeed mean you created your implementation using XPath node-sets. </Boyer> __ Joseph Reagle Jr. W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2000 09:48:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT