W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: XMLDSIG meeting at 49th IETF Meeting?

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:31:41 -0400
Message-Id: <200010262131.RAA10059@noah.dma.isg.mot.com>
To: "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, lde008@dma.isg.mot.com

From:  "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
Message-Id:  <4.3.2.7.2.20001026155410.03369bf0@rpcp.mit.edu>
Date:  Thu, 26 Oct 2000 16:12:43 -0400
To:  Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc:  w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org, lde008@dma.isg.mot.com
In-Reply-To:  <200010261919.PAA20762@noah.dma.isg.mot.com>

>At 15:19 10/26/2000 -0400, Donald Eastlake 3rd wrote:
>>We can easily cancel this meeting.
>
>I don't see we have any open issues to discuss, but I'm not as familiar with 
>the conventions of the IETF and whether the WG is expected to be present for 
>a general update in a WG session or the SAAG. Regardless, if folks in the WG 
>don't request a meeting, I'd expect you would be there I'd be happy to defer 
>and rely upon your presence regardless.

I can certainly stand up and give a report at the open Security Area
meeting ("SAAG") meeting, which is Thursday afternoon at the upcoming
San Diego IETF meeting regardless of whether or not there is an
XMLDSIG WG meeting or any other WG memebers are present.

>I'd certainly encourage folks to work on interop if they are there and have 
>the opportunity, and perhaps we could organize something like last time. 
>However, if that would be the only reason for people to attend, we could 
>lighten the travel by organizing a teleconference/IRC session  However, 
>exchanging examples on the list seems to have been working well and I don't 
>think that avenue is exhausted yet.
>__
>Joseph Reagle Jr.
>W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
>IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/

Thanks,
Donald
Received on Thursday, 26 October 2000 17:31:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT