W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2000

Re: Very minor comment in the spec.

From: Donald E. Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 08:29:35 -0400
Message-Id: <200010031229.IAA08540@torque.pothole.com>
To: Yoshiaki KAWATSURA <kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>
cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
I don't think there is any significant use of other than v3 these days.

Donald

From:  Yoshiaki KAWATSURA <kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>
To:  w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Cc:  kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp
In-Reply-To:  <4.3.2.7.2.20001002171759.02e06040@rpcp.mit.edu>
References:  <200009280812.RAA10090@ns.trl.ibm.com>
	    	<200009290127.KAA26690@ns.trl.ibm.com>
	    	<4.3.2.7.2.20001002171759.02e06040@rpcp.mit.edu>
Message-Id:  <20001003183030K.kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>
Date:  Tue, 03 Oct 2000 18:30:30 +0900 (JST)

>I have a very minor comment in the spec.
>###
>4.4.4 The X509Data Element
>
>    5. The X509CRL element, which contains a Base64-encoded X.509v2
>                                                            ^^^^^^^
>       certificate revocation list (CRL).
>###
>
>X.509v3 is better though we can also contain a Base64-encoded X.509v2
>CRL in the X509CRL...
>
>----
>Yoshiaki Kawatsura : E-mail kawatura@bisd.hitachi.co.jp
> Business Solution Systems Division, Hitachi,Ltd.
>Voice: +81-44-549-1713(direct) Fax: +81-44-549-1721
>
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2000 08:26:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:11 GMT