public-rif-wg@w3.org from May 2006 by author

Alex Kozlenkov

• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)

Allen Ginsberg

• Re: [RIF] Critical Success Factors for Goal 1 (Friday, 19 May)

Axel Polleres

• Re: RIFRAF analysis for DLV (Wednesday, 24 May)
• RIFRAF analysis for WRL (Wednesday, 17 May)
• RIFRAF analysis for DLV (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Interesting side event at ESWC 2006 (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Last CfP: Applications of Logic Programming in the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services (ALPSWS2006) (Monday, 1 May)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: A thought about requirements (Monday, 29 May)
• Re: A thought about requirements (Monday, 29 May)
• Re: XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)

Boley, Harold

• [RIF][Admin] Draft minutes from Telecon 2006-05-23 (Thursday, 25 May)
• RE: RIFRAF analysis for DLV (Tuesday, 23 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Saturday, 20 May)
• RE: [RIF] Evaluation of RIRAF for IRL and LIFE (Tuesday, 16 May)

Chris Menzel

• Semantics without variable maps (Thursday, 4 May)

Chris Welty

• Re: [ALL] Important: Requirements for RIF - actions for f2f absentees (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Monday, 29 May)
• Re: A thought about requirements (Monday, 29 May)
• [ALL] upcoming telecon notes (Saturday, 27 May)
• [RIF] Agenda for telecon 30 May (Saturday, 27 May)
• [ALL] Important: Requirements for RIF - path forward to second UCR WD (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Friday, 26 May)
• [ALL] Update on regrets policy (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Editors for Phase I technical spec (Wednesday, 24 May)
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Thursday, 11 May)
• [RIF] Agenda 9 May RIF Telecon (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: Semantics without variable maps (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: RIF Homework for May 2 Telecon (Tuesday, 2 May)
• [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon (Tuesday, 2 May)

Christian de Sainte Marie

• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• [RIF][Admin] Draft agenda for F2F3, 8-9 June, Budva (Wednesday, 24 May)
• [RIF] Agenda for telecon 23 May (REVISED) (Monday, 22 May)
• [RIF] Agenda for telecon 23 May (Monday, 22 May)
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Monday, 22 May)
• Re: XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Wednesday, 17 May)
• [RIF] Agenda for 16 May telecon (Monday, 15 May)

Christopher Welty

• [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Wednesday, 10 May)
• [UCR] Review from SPARQL WG (Wednesday, 10 May)
• [ALL] Re: Rules, and XBRL (Wednesday, 10 May)
• [ALL] RIF discussion for next week (Tuesday, 9 May)

Dan Connolly

• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: [UCR] Review from Sven Groppe (Wednesday, 10 May)

Dave Reynolds

• Re: RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: A requirements diagram (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Wednesday, 17 May)
• [Admin] Draft minutes from Telecon 2006-05-16 (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [UCR] Proposal for RIF' design constraints hierarchy (Tuesday, 2 May)

ewallace@cme.nist.gov

• RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: [RIF] Critical Success Factors for Goal 1 (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: A requirements diagram (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: soundness and semantics (Wednesday, 17 May)
• XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Tuesday, 16 May)

Francis McCabe

• Re: A thought about requirements (Monday, 29 May)
• A thought about requirements (Sunday, 28 May)
• A requirements diagram (Wednesday, 17 May)

Francois Bry

• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements (Monday, 29 May)
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Monday, 29 May)
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: soundness and semantics (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: soundness and semantics (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Thursday, 11 May)
• soundness and semantics (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (H-Prolog and SH-Prolog ?) (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: [RIF]: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: [RIF]: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: Semantics without variable maps (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)

Frank McCabe

• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)

Gary Hallmark

• [UCR] New use case illustrating XML data (Monday, 22 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)

Gerd Wagner

• RE: A thought about requirements --> PRR (Wednesday, 31 May)
• RE: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Friday, 26 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design / Predicate Typing (Monday, 22 May)
• RE: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Friday, 19 May)
• RE: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Wednesday, 17 May)
• RE: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• RE: [RIF]: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al --> ECA vs PR (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)

Ginsberg, Allen

• [RIF] Critical Success Factors for Goal 1 (Thursday, 18 May)
• RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Thursday, 11 May)

Hassan Aït-Kaci

• Re: RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 (Wednesday, 31 May)
• RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Thursday, 18 May)
• Formal Concept Analysis and conceptual lattice drawing (Tuesday, 16 May)
• [RIF] Evaluation of RIRAF for IRL and LIFE (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)

Hirtle, David

• RE: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Monday, 15 May)

Jeff Z. Pan

• Re: [RIF] Agenda for telecon 30 May (Monday, 29 May)

Jos de Bruijn

• [SWC] representational issues in combining rules and ontologies (Tuesday, 30 May)

jos.deroo@agfa.com

• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (H-Prolog and SH-Prolog ?) (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)

Leora Morgenstern

• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements: Whatever happened to first-order logic as a requirement? (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: [RIF] Goals and Critical Success Factors as they relate to first-order logic (Tuesday, 9 May)
• [RIF] Goals and Critical Success Factors as they relate to first-order logic (Tuesday, 9 May)
• [RIF] Proposal for vanilla first-order logic (Tuesday, 9 May)

Mala Mehrotra

• Re: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon (Tuesday, 2 May)

Michael Kifer

• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Thursday, 18 May)
• RIFRAF and language taxonomy (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: RIF Homework for May 2 Telecon (Tuesday, 2 May)
• Re: RIF Homework for May 2 Telecon (Tuesday, 2 May)

Mike Dean

• Draft W3C RIF WG minutes 2006-05-02 (Tuesday, 2 May)

Obrst, Leo J.

• RE: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• RE: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)

Paula-Lavinia Patranjan

• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements: Whatever happened to first-order logic as a requirement? (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Draft agenda for F2F3, 8-9 June, Budva (Monday, 29 May)
• [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Wednesday, 24 May)
• [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Tuesday, 23 May)
• RIFRAF analysis of Xcerpt and XChange (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: A requirements diagram (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: soundness and semantics (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? (Thursday, 18 May)
• F2F3 - Confirmation of room reservation (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: [RIF] Goals and Critical Success Factors as they relate to first-order logic (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: [UCR] Proposal for RIF' design constraints hierarchy (Tuesday, 2 May)
• F2F3 reminder: Information for the local transportation needed by May 3 (Tuesday, 2 May)
• [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Tuesday, 2 May)
• Re: RIF Homework for May 2 Telecon (Tuesday, 2 May)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 (Wednesday, 31 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: A thought about requirements (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Tuesday, 30 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Sunday, 28 May)
• Re: [RIF] Agenda for telecon 30 May (Saturday, 27 May)
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Saturday, 27 May)
• A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Tuesday, 23 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Friday, 19 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Thursday, 18 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Wednesday, 17 May)
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Wednesday, 17 May)
• mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal (Tuesday, 16 May)
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Friday, 12 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• Re: [UCR] Proposal for RIF' design constraints hierarchy (Tuesday, 2 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Tuesday, 2 May)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Friday, 26 May)
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: soundness and semantics (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Thursday, 11 May)
• Re: [UCR] Review from Sven Groppe (Wednesday, 10 May)
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (H-Prolog and SH-Prolog ?) (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Tuesday, 9 May)
• Re: soundness for RIF (Tuesday, 9 May)
• instead of "Pure Prolog" (Monday, 8 May)
• soundness for RIF (Monday, 8 May)
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design (Thursday, 4 May)

Stan Devitt

• RE: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Friday, 26 May)
• RE: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Friday, 26 May)
• RE: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF (Wednesday, 24 May)
• RE: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Friday, 12 May)
• [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call (Thursday, 11 May)
• RE: soundness and semantics (Thursday, 11 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design (Friday, 5 May)
• RE: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon (Friday, 5 May)

Uli Sattler

• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Thursday, 4 May)
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)

Vincent, Paul D

• RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR (Wednesday, 31 May)
• RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR (Wednesday, 31 May)
• RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR (Tuesday, 30 May)
• RIF: A thought about requirements (Sunday, 28 May)
• RE: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? (Thursday, 18 May)
• RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? (Thursday, 18 May)
• RE: XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Tuesday, 16 May)
• RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use (Thursday, 11 May)
• [RIF]: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" (Monday, 8 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics (Thursday, 4 May)
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics (Thursday, 4 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al --> ECA vs PR (Wednesday, 3 May)
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al --> ECA vs PR (Wednesday, 3 May)

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 May 2006 16:45:17 UTC