It is not possible to have no semantics. Even 'syntax-only' is a kind of semantics. An exercise for the philosopher: try to write down the semantics of logic without using syntax. Frank On May 4, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Francois Bry wrote: > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >>>> That there is no formal role for semantics in the RIF - it is >>>> just an >>>> interchange syntax. >>>> > > If I understand well, the above statement aims at provoking reactions. > (I apologize, if I am wrong!) > > Are there in this WG members thinking the RIF should habve no > semantics? > > François >Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 16:24:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:28 GMT