[...] >> o Conformance model. I've not yet seen an example of when a default >> behaviour other than "ignore ruleset" could be used and question the >> linking of conformance model to the "default behaviour" proposal >> (which currently only has one named champion). > The conformance model is more general than just 'ignore ruleset'. It > also relates to the multiple formal semantics for different rule sets, > e.g. in case one needs to combine two rule sets with different > semantics. There are also other examples such as interchange between > systems supporting priorities for rules and systems without such support > where other conformance models than just ignore rules could make sense. I'm reminded about DanC's [[ Any understanding (that you think) that is established without a basis in black-and-white test cases and/or code will almost certainly vaporize as soon as a few new people join the activity, or as soon as the results of the activity are presented to a wider audience. ]] so can we make those "other examples" really tangible?? -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 22:47:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:29 GMT