- From: Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 12:42:56 +0200
- To: W3C RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Michael Kifer wrote: > "Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com> wrote: > >> It was my understanding that RIF phase 1 was more of an "academic" >> exercise (without PRR), but subsequent phases would address PRR. >> > > Exactly! > > Datalog is no more than a toy. This is why I kept emphasising planning for > Ph 2, which is supposed to integrate PR, CWA, and active rules. > > > --michael > > > +1. Datalog for phase 1 is not really interesting. PRR and ECA rules are undoubtedly needed. Why not consider them already for phase 1? Francois
Received on Monday, 29 May 2006 10:43:05 UTC