W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2006

Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al

From: Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 13:52:48 +0200
Message-ID: <44589990.1040602@ifi.lmu.de>
To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
CC: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@inf.unibz.it>, paula.patranjan@ifi.lmu.de, public-rif-wg@w3.org, francois.bry@pms.ifi.lmu.de

Michael Kifer wrote:
>> We have also just seen a proposal to add counted quantifiers.
>>     
>
> This was thrown in but to make it fly one would have to incorporate these
> quantifiers into the answer-set and well-founded semantics. (My understanding
> is that Francois main interest is in CWA-based dialects.)
> I think a better and a more natural way to express this kind of features is to
> use aggregate functions. (For CWA-based dialects.)
>   
C pounting quantifiers" can be expressed by aggregate functions. As
shorthand, or syntactic sugaring, they aree very uimportant *in practice*.

François
Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 12:30:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:28 GMT