Michael Kifer wrote: >> We have also just seen a proposal to add counted quantifiers. >> > > This was thrown in but to make it fly one would have to incorporate these > quantifiers into the answer-set and well-founded semantics. (My understanding > is that Francois main interest is in CWA-based dialects.) > I think a better and a more natural way to express this kind of features is to > use aggregate functions. (For CWA-based dialects.) > C pounting quantifiers" can be expressed by aggregate functions. As shorthand, or syntactic sugaring, they aree very uimportant *in practice*. FrançoisReceived on Wednesday, 3 May 2006 12:30:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:28 GMT