Re: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? from Francois Bry on 2006-05-18 (public-rif-wg@w3.org from May 2006)

From: Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 10:13:37 +0200
To: "Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>
CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <446C2CB1.30309@ifi.lmu.de>

Vincent, Paul D wrote:
> The *requirement* is interchange, and a *solution* to achieve that would be a declarative semantics interchange format. 
>
>   

This is surely not worng but maybe not fully accurate. In my opinion,
there are no other solution. Therefore, this is a *requirement*. I can
well see it a *functional requirement* (a kind of *requirement* :-))
François

Received on Thursday, 18 May 2006 08:13:42 UTC