Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements

Dave Reynolds wrote:
> 
> Perhaps I was reading too much into the link to the "default behaviour" 
> requirement. I assume there is then a need for someone to edit a page on 
> a conformance model requirement.

I just modified the "default behaviour" proposed requirement to make it 
more like a requirement and less like a proposed design [1]. Does that 
answer your concerns? Default behaviour and conformance model are 
somewhat dual, aren't they?

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/RIF_must_define_expected_default_behaviour

Christian