- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 16:34:34 +0200
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Paula-Lavinia Patranjan <paula.patranjan@ifi.lmu.de>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
Dave Reynolds wrote: > > Perhaps I was reading too much into the link to the "default behaviour" > requirement. I assume there is then a need for someone to edit a page on > a conformance model requirement. I just modified the "default behaviour" proposed requirement to make it more like a requirement and less like a proposed design [1]. Does that answer your concerns? Default behaviour and conformance model are somewhat dual, aren't they? [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/RIF_must_define_expected_default_behaviour Christian
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2006 14:37:42 UTC