W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2006

Re: [RIF] Extensible Design

From: Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 16:24:06 +0200
Message-ID: <445A0E86.5000306@ifi.lmu.de>
To: W3C RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org> 

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> That there is no formal role for semantics in the RIF - it is just an
>>> interchange syntax.
>>>       

If I understand well, the above statement aims at provoking reactions.
(I apologize, if I am wrong!)

Are there in this WG members thinking the RIF should habve no semantics?

François
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 14:24:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:28 GMT