public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from January 2006 by thread

Re: SPARQL: incorrect/confusing example in 9.3 Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)

Re: SPARQL: Backslashes in string literals [OK?] Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)

Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Error handling Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)

Re: SPARQL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)

Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: BASE IRI resolution Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)

Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named Bjoern Hoehrmann (Sunday, 29 January)

[OK?] Re: SPARQL: format based on Unicode? Eric Prud'hommeaux (Thursday, 26 January)

Re: Use Case for DESCRIBE [OK?] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 25 January)

Re: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases [OK?] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 25 January)

Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused [OK?] Dan Connolly (Monday, 23 January)

Grammar updated to reflect BGP/Constraint interpretation Seaborne, Andy (Monday, 23 January)

Questions on the Sparql marcos rebelo (Thursday, 19 January)

[OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)

[OK?] Re: Section 3 of SPARQL protocol partially out of scope. Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)

[OK?] Re: Double binding of a WSDL 2.0 operation Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)

[OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)

Common variables across multiple optional blocks Ian Davis (Tuesday, 17 January)

[OK?] Re: [comments] SPARQL Protocol against QA SpecGL ICS Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)

[OK?] Re: [comments] typo and general Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)

[OK?] Re: Comments on SPARQL protocol document Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)

[OK?] Re: Comments on SPARQL protocol document Kendall Clark (Tuesday, 17 January)

URI serialization issues Mark Baker (Tuesday, 17 January)

[OK?] Re: BASE absolute IRIs Eric Prud'hommeaux (Tuesday, 17 January)

Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases Ian Davis (Monday, 16 January)

Use Case for DESCRIBE Axel Rauschmayer (Saturday, 14 January)

major technical: no privilege model Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

major technical: dateTime arithmetic Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

major technical: no aggregates Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

major technical: no subqueries Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

major technical: orthogonality Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

major technical: underspecified errors Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

major technical: blank nodes Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

major technical: runaway queries Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

major technical: semantics are poorly specified Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

editorial comments on SPARQL Query Lanuage for RDF Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical: omissions from Appendix B Conformance Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical: A.7 grammar, rule [25] Constraint Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical: are periods separators or terminators? Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical comments on A.4 Comments Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical: are variable names case insensitive? Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on A.3 Keywords Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on 11.2.2 Effective boolean value Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on 11.2.1 Invocation Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on 10.4.3 Description of resources Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on 10.3 Constructing an output graph Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on 10.2 Selecting variables Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on 10.1 Solution sequences and result forms Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on 9 Specifying RDF datasets Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical on 5.4 Optional matching - formal definition Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

minor technical comment on 2.1.3 Syntax of variables Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

[OK?] Re: Minor editorial issues for WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914 Kendall Clark (Thursday, 12 January)

Major technical comment: identifier length Fred Zemke (Thursday, 12 January)

HTTP response code discussion Mark Baker (Wednesday, 11 January)

[closed]: Protocol erratum Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 11 January)

[closed]: Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 11 January)

[public-rdf-dawg-comments] <none> Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr (Wednesday, 11 January)

Re: [Ok?] Re: Wrong SOAP namespace Hugo Haas (Wednesday, 11 January)

Suspicious mismatch between SPARQL grammar rules and examples Ivan Mikhailov (Tuesday, 10 January)

SPARQL DESCRIBE (Personal comments) Jacco van Ossenbruggen (Monday, 9 January)

Re: QName production in SPARQL grammar [OK?] Dan Connolly (Monday, 9 January)

Re: sparql describe - options?! Seaborne, Andy (Monday, 9 January)

SPARQL and Unicode versions Dave Beckett (Saturday, 7 January)

Protocol erratum Richard Newman (Saturday, 7 January)

Re: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document [OK?] Seaborne, Andy (Friday, 6 January)

langMatches wording in sparql query 2005-11-23 and tests Dave Beckett (Friday, 6 January)

[OK?] Re: Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol Kendall Clark (Thursday, 5 January)

Re: Suspicious notation in SPARQL lexical rule for STRING_LITERAL_LONG1 [OK?] Seaborne, Andy (Thursday, 5 January)

Re: HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Kendall Clark (Thursday, 5 January)

Re: [Fwd: SPARQL Protocol Review and Comments] Kendall Clark (Wednesday, 4 January)

Re: disjunction, query language, data representation ... [closed] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 4 January)

Re: WSDL comments on SPARQL Protocol LC Draft [OK?] Dan Connolly (Wednesday, 4 January)

Re: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, sections 3 onwards [OK?] Seaborne, Andy (Wednesday, 4 January)

[CLOSED] Re: Broad application of CSS hypertext pseudo-classes (as to SPARQL "link" elements) Jeen Broekstra (Tuesday, 3 January)

[CLOSED] Re: Small comment on rdf-sparql-xmlres and CSS styling Jeen Broekstra (Tuesday, 3 January)

[Closed] Re: [Ok?] Re: SPARQL Protocol comments (editorial) Arjohn Kampman (Monday, 2 January)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2006 16:55:53 UTC