W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

Re: [OK?] Re: [Fwd: SPARQL Protocol Review and Comments]

From: David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 22:54:58 -0500
Message-Id: <4F98A0E2-11D1-40A1-A0F9-898030F314BF@softwarememetics.com>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>

On 4 Jan2006, at 15:07, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2006, at 3:01 PM, David Wood wrote:
>> I gave some thought to adding some explanatory text to Section  
>> 2.1.4, but gave up.  Instead, I believe that the current use of  
>> the word 'should' correctly states the WG's position.
> Have all of yr comments been addressed to yr satisfaction?

Yes, indeed.  Thanks for your hard work and careful review.

Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 03:55:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT