[OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples

On Jan 28, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>
> * Kendall Clark wrote:
>>>>>   * some violate http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-text-xml
>>>>>   * some violate http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#no-charset
>>
>> I believe the latest editor's draft:
>>
>> 	http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/
>>
>> addresses yr comments sufficiently. Can you let us know whether
>> that's the case?
>
> Yes for the two comments above, but
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ 
> 2005Dec/0024.html

Okay, the latest editor's draft contains fixes for most of these  
comments:

editor's draft $Revision: 1.106 $ of $Date: 2006/01/29 16:16:47 $
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/

Notably,

Changed some mime type thingies:
- added charset to text/plain in 2.2.1.9
- added charset to text/html in 2.2.1.10
- added a doctype declaration in 2.2.1.10
- removed application/dime from the SOAP example

However, re: N3 MIME type being unregistered, I refer you to http:// 
www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3.html, and if that doesn't satisfy  
you, I urge you to take this issue up with the Director or with Tim  
Berners-Lee, which ever seems to you most appropriate.

Please let me know if these changes and this response is satisfactory.

Cheers,
Kendall