Re: editorial comments on SPARQL Query Lanuage for RDF

Thanks for the careful review and comments.

We hope to get back to you within a week or two about these;
I think our backlog is clearing. But it may take a little
while longer.

I presume your comments are with respect to the draft of 23 Nov, yes?
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20051123/

On this one in particular:

On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 09:47 -0800, Fred Zemke wrote:
[...]
> Appendix D, Collected formal definitions
> This appendix is listed in the table of content but is not present,
> not even as a to-be-done item.

It's there...

The link from the table of contents takes you to a separate file:
 http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20051123/defns.html

We'll have to think about ways to make that more clear.



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E