> The following looks like a use case for DESCRIBE. If it is then my > vote is in favor of making DESCRIBE part of the basic SPARQL standard: [...] DESCRIBE is currently part of SPARQL, though there is outstanding dissent over this decision. I have noted your comment in support of DESCRIBE along with those against... http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#DESCRIBE Please let us know if this is a satisfactory response. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 15:33:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT