On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 17:28 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: [... a response that formally addresses this comment...] > I hope you find this justification satisfactory. Please let us > know whether you do. So this thread is in [OK?] state. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 14:30:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT