[closed] Re: Incorrect braces in Sparql test cases [OK?]

I'm ok with this response but as an implementor I of course would like 
to have the tests kept current. I'll continue to keep notes on erroneous 
tests that I find and I'll probably fix those that I'm confident about - 
  I'll make those available for use by the WG if they wish.

Ian

On 25/01/2006 15:05, Dan Connolly wrote:
> [...]
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/simple2/dawg-tp-04.rq
> [...]
>> Is my interpretation of the grammar correct and should these tests be 
>> updated?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Thanks for pointing out this problem with the test materials.
> 
> The spec itself is in last call, where the WG has a rather
> formal obligation to address all comments.
> 
> We'll eventually get around to cleaning up the test materials...
> the WG has been discussing it...
> 
> [[
> those are the only ones (4 IIRC) I'm aware of that have become erroneous
> due to syntax changes in the spec.
> ]]
>  -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006JanMar/0142.html
> 
> ... meanwhile, I hope this is a satisfactory response regarding the
> spec itself.
> 
> Please let us know whether it is.
> 
> If you're satisfied, you can put [closed] in the subject
> of your reply to save us a bit of bookkeeping.
>

Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 16:29:17 UTC