Re: [OK?] Re: Comments on SPARQL protocol document

On Jan 17, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Kendall Clark wrote:

>
> On Sep 16, 2005, at 9:31 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>> I would probably focus any such suggestions on security  
>> mechanisms, and leave the policy specification/decision mechanisms  
>> to be application-dependent.
>
> The latest editor's draft of the protocol spec removes all privacy  
> policy discussion. Is that responsive to yr comments about over- 
> prescriptivity?

Oops, sorry, Graham, I should have included a link:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/

Cheers,
Kendall

Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 21:30:42 UTC