W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

Re: [OK?] Re: Comments on SPARQL protocol document

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:30:38 -0500
Message-Id: <F6DF928E-5D1D-473F-8112-2843919E0E3D@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>


On Jan 17, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Kendall Clark wrote:

>
> On Sep 16, 2005, at 9:31 AM, Graham Klyne wrote:
>> I would probably focus any such suggestions on security  
>> mechanisms, and leave the policy specification/decision mechanisms  
>> to be application-dependent.
>
> The latest editor's draft of the protocol spec removes all privacy  
> policy discussion. Is that responsive to yr comments about over- 
> prescriptivity?

Oops, sorry, Graham, I should have included a link:

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/

Cheers,
Kendall
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 21:30:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT