W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

[CLOSED] Re: [CLOSED] Re: BASE absolute IRIs

From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@appmosphere.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:58:42 +0100
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, Richard Newman <rnewman@tellme.com>
Message-ID: <PM-EH.20060117165842.620B9.1.1D@192.168.27.2>


yes, that's absolutely fine with me, too.

thanks,
benjamin



On 17.01.2006 00:48:00, Richard Newman wrote:
>Eric,
>
>> The SPARQL language specification does not talk
>> about applications; would this addendum satisfy you:?
>> [[
>> If none of the above specifies the Base URI, the default Base URI
>> (5.1.4, Default Base URI) is used.
>> ]]
>
>That seems satisfying to me.
>
>> Would adding the text
>> [[
>> BASE URIs must be absolute.
>> ]]
>> to section A.1 IRI References address this comment?
>
>As A.1 supplements the grammar, this seems like a perfectly fine  
>solution to me. I've marked this issue as CLOSED, but I would be  
>pleased to receive corroboratory remarks from Benjamin if he agrees.
>
>Many thanks,
>-R
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 15:58:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT