Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples

Kendall Clark wrote:

> The WG discussed this issue and declined to specify any format for  
> describing error messages. As far as clients being unable to  "reliably 
> extract an error message", I can only reiterate that in the  HTTP case, 
> for example, the WSDL fault is serialized by an HTTP  status code (400 
> for MalformedQuery and 500 for QueryRequestRefused)  and the (optional) 
> fault-details part of the WSDL fault may be  included in the body of the 
> HTTP request, which I believe to be  reliably extractable.
> 
> Please let us know whether this sufficiently addresses yr comments?

Yes, thats fine.

I still think that standardising error messages/codes would be a good 
thing to do, but accept that it's not essential for the first spec, and
*could* given sufficient implementation experience, be achieved at a
later date.

Cheers,

L.

-- 
Home: http://www.ldodds.com      | "Simplicity is the ultimate
Blog: http://www.ldodds.com/blog | sophistication" -- Leonardo da Vinci