Re: major technical: no privilege model

Understood, though I do refer to the 'experience' argument -- I'm  
implementing precisely this now, so I thought I'd share my  
professional views on the subject. I did not intend to appear to be  
representing the WG, and I apologise if that impression was given.

I shall be more circumspect in future.

Thanks,

-R


On 12 Jan 2006, at 15:42, Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 14:57 -0800, Richard Newman wrote:
>> I'd call this utterly outside of the scope of SPARQL.
>>
>> Fine-grained privilege control for RDF is a hard, largely-unsolved
>> problem.
>
> This mailing list is mostly for discussion between
> commentors and the working group. It's useful when you
> add factual information or experience, but the Working Group
> has a process obligation to formally address Fred's last
> call comments (and all other last call comments), and when you
> add your own personal argument, it may mislead Fred into thinking
> that yours is a position of, or argument from, the Working Group.
>
> Feel free to send comments of your own, but please be very  
> conservative
> in responding to other comments.