W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

Re: minor technical on 10.4.3 Description of resources [OK?]

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:28:55 +0000
Message-ID: <43D52E77.1030307@hp.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Forgot add [OK?] to subject line

	Andy

Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Fred Zemke wrote:
>> 10.4.3 Description of resources
>> Formal definition, you may want to do an explicit DISTINCT reduction
>> on "U union project(SM(SQ), VS)" to indicate that the result graph
>> does not contain redundant information.
> 
> An RDF graph is a set of statements, any duplication of information 
> would be
> removed at that point.  But as blank nodes might be involved, I've 
> changed it to "distinct(U union project(SM(SQ), VS))" to make it clear.
> 
>>
>> Fred Zemke
>>
>>
> 
> I hope this addresses your comment - please let us know if it does.
> 
>     Andy
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 19:29:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT