W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

[OK?] Re: Double binding of a WSDL 2.0 operation

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:56:14 -0500
Message-Id: <C7B3B942-B738-4953-A896-183C562B0420@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
To: <paul.downey@bt.com> <paul.downey@bt.com>

On Nov 15, 2005, at 4:29 PM, <paul.downey@bt.com>  
<paul.downey@bt.com> wrote:

> Dear DAWG,
> following discussion of the WSD WG review of the SPARQL Protocol
> Working Draft [1], it became apparent that the binding of the single
> "query" operation twice within the same binding to the GET and POST
> methods isn't legal WSDL 2.0 [2].
> The suggested work-round is to provide two separate HTTP bindings,
> and therefore two separate endpoints, one for each HTTP method.


The latest version of the editor's draft provides two HTTP bindings,  
queryHttpGet and queryHttpPost, per yr suggestion:


Please let us know whether this sufficiently addresses yr comments?

Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 21:56:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:07 UTC