W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

[Closed] Re: [Ok?] Re: SPARQL Protocol comments (editorial)

From: Arjohn Kampman <arjohn.kampman@aduna.biz>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:24:58 +0100
Message-ID: <43B8FF7A.9090405@aduna.biz>
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Kendall Clark wrote:
> 
> 
> On Oct 26, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Arjohn Kampman wrote:
> 
>>
>> (comments are on the current editor's draft, revision 1.76)
> 
> 
> Arjohn,
> 
> As of the latest editor's draft, 1.81, (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/ 
> DataAccess/proto-wd/), I believe yr comments are addressed, to wit:
> 
>> The HTTP-POST example (section 2.2.1.11) seems to be malformed: the  key
>> of the query parameter is part of the URL but the parameter value is
>> part of the request body.
> 
> 
> Corrected. See 2.2.1.11.
> 
>> Further, there are some spelling errors in the document:
>> - "compatability" (in Introduction)
>> - "consumpution" (twice in section 2.1.4)
>> - "negotation" (in title of section 2.2.1.3)
> 
> 
> Also corrected.
> 
> Do these changes address yr concerns? Thanks for yr help with this spec.

They do, thanks.
Received on Monday, 2 January 2006 10:32:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT