- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:39:28 -0000
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
> From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> > Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:34:50 -0400 (EDT) > Message-Id: <20050923.103450.72232373.pfps@research.bell-labs.com> > To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > > The terms "bnode" and "blank node" are both used in the document. > One should be defined as a shorthand of the other or, preferable, > only one should be used. > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider Peter, The document now only uses the term "blank node" - all mentions of "bnode" have been replaced or removed. Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment. If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping. Thanks, Andy
Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 10:39:42 UTC