W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

[closed] Re: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document [OK?]

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:31:39 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20060106.083139.72196047.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

I trust that the right thing has been done here.

peter


From: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Subject: Re: inconsistent use of terminology in SPARQL query language document [OK?]
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:39:28 -0000

> > From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> > Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 10:34:50 -0400 (EDT)
> > Message-Id: <20050923.103450.72232373.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
> > To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
> > 
> > The terms "bnode" and "blank node" are both used in the document.
> > One should be defined as a shorthand of the other or, preferable,
> > only one should be used.
> > 
> > Peter F. Patel-Schneider
> 
> Peter,
> 
> The document now only uses the term "blank node" - all mentions of
> "bnode" have been replaced or removed.
> 
> Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment.
> 
> If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the
> subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping.
> 
> 	Thanks,
> 	Andy
> 
Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 13:31:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT