Re: Use Case for DESCRIBE [CLOSED?]

On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 15:34 +0100, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> >> The following looks like a use case for DESCRIBE. If it is then my  
> >> vote is in favor of making DESCRIBE part of the basic SPARQL standard:
> >>     
> > [...]
> >
> > DESCRIBE is currently part of SPARQL, though there is outstanding
> > dissent over this decision. I have noted your comment in support
> > of DESCRIBE along with those against...
> >   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#DESCRIBE
> >
> > Please let us know if this is a satisfactory response.
> >
> >   
> Absolutely! You've put my comment at the right place. Still: I've 
> included a caveat, namely that I am not sure if it is a use case for 
> DESCRIBE.

Yes, I think it is.

Thanks for your careful review and comments. I'm marking this thread
closed.

>  If it's not, then my comment should be removed, I guess.
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Axel
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E