- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:22:58 -0600
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:16 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:50 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > >> The spec says that in the case of a syntax error, the MalformedQuery > >> fault should be returned. > > > > That's not what I'm looking for. I'm looking for the text > > that follows from this WG decision: > > > > "for queries that are not SPARQL Query Strings, you should return > > MalformedQuery and you must not return 2xx" > > -- http://www.w3.org/2005/08/16-dawg-minutes#item04 > > Well, it used to say "must not return 2xx", but, as you pointed out, > that's a bad leakage from the concrete into the abstract. > > What did we *mean* when we said "must not return 2xx"? Did we mean > "must not return Out Message"? I thought so, but if it's not clear enough from records, we'll have to discuss it again. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 30 January 2006 14:24:35 UTC