W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > January 2006

Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Error handling

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:22:58 -0600
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1138630978.4991.972.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 09:16 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2006, at 8:50 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
> 
> >> The spec says that in the case of a syntax error, the MalformedQuery
> >> fault should be returned.
> >
> > That's not what I'm looking for. I'm looking for the text
> > that follows from this WG decision:
> >
> > "for queries that are not SPARQL Query Strings, you should return
> > MalformedQuery and you must not return 2xx"
> >  -- http://www.w3.org/2005/08/16-dawg-minutes#item04
> 
> Well, it used to say "must not return 2xx", but, as you pointed out,  
> that's a bad leakage from the concrete into the abstract.
> 
> What did we *mean* when we said "must not return 2xx"? Did we mean  
> "must not return Out Message"?

I thought so, but if it's not clear enough from records, we'll
have to discuss it again.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 30 January 2006 14:24:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT