xml-dist-app@w3.org from June 2002 by author

Alok Srivastava

• Re: [ice-dev] Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Monday, 17 June)

Bob Cunnings

• Re: differences between soap 1.1 and soap 1.2 (Saturday, 29 June)
• Re: differences between soap 1.1 and soap 1.2 (Saturday, 29 June)

Champion, Mike

• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: List of outstanding issues regarding the RPC proposal (Monday, 3 June)

Christopher Ferris

• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwith Henrik's option B) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updated draftwith Henrik's option B) (Tuesday, 4 June)

cristov@hotmail.com

• How To Secure Your Financial Future And Increase Your Income 15819 (Wednesday, 5 June)

cristy185@hotmail.com

• Lose 14 Pounds In 7 Days 11604 (Monday, 24 June)

cristy_20@hotmail.com

• Lose 30 Pounds In 10 Days 8878 (Saturday, 15 June)

David Fallside

• XML Protocol WG's Last Call for Review of SOAP 1.2 (Wednesday, 26 June)
• fyi: Summary of resolution to TAG Get finding (Monday, 17 June)
• Primer draft with GET Additions (Monday, 10 June)
• Re: Republishing SOAP 1.1 schemas (Tuesday, 4 June)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Republishing SOAP 1.1 schemas (Tuesday, 4 June)

Eric Newcomer

• RE: Administrivia (Monday, 17 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)

ezgo@w3.org

• 超值雙組合=駭客技術加新名單 sRhGCBYn4c1X9o9f (Sunday, 16 June)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Monday, 17 June)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• MS SOAP 1.2 endpoint (Friday, 28 June)
• FW: Two new Internet drafts: DIME and WS-Attachments (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Tuesday, 25 June)
• RE: Henrik's media type comments (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• RE: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updated draftwith Henrik's option B) (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updated draft with Henrik's option B) (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: [getf] Proposal for Web-friendly representation of RPC's in SOAP (Sunday, 2 June)

Hung Nguyen Quang

• SOAP (Friday, 28 June)

Hurley, Oisin

• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Friday, 14 June)

info@w3.org

• Double Your Life Insurance at NO EXTRA COST! (Wednesday, 19 June)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: differences between soap 1.1 and soap 1.2 (Saturday, 29 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: LC Issues from Spec reviews (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: WSDL Version 1.2 Part 2: Bindings, date 2002/4/11 (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B) (Thursday, 6 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwithHenrik's option B) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updateddraftwith Henrik's option B) (Wednesday, 5 June)
• Re: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updated draftwith Henrik's option B) (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: [GETF] okay, here's an updated draft with Henrik's option B (Monday, 3 June)
• [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updated draft with Henrik's option B) (Monday, 3 June)

John Ibbotson

• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)

John J. Barton

• RE: [getf] Proposal for Web-friendly representation of RPC's in SOAP (Saturday, 1 June)

Jordi A Albornoz

• encodingStyle is a list of URIs in Envelope Schema (Thursday, 13 June)

Joseph Hui

• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)

Joshua Allen

• RE: [getf] Proposal for Web-friendly representation of RPC's in SOAP (Friday, 31 May)

Kevin Johnsrude

• What is the difference between a "struct" and an "array" in the e dge case? (Friday, 28 June)
• HTTP 427 in SOAP 1.2 Primer (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Root Attribute Still in SOAP 1.2? (Thursday, 27 June)
• RE: Is whitespace significant in SOAP Messages? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Is whitespace significant in SOAP Messages? (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Processing Instructions and SOAP (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Root Attribute Still in SOAP 1.2? (Monday, 3 June)

Laird Popkin

• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Thursday, 20 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Monday, 17 June)

Marc Hadley

• LC Issues from Spec reviews (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: HTTP 427 in SOAP 1.2 Primer (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: Root Attribute Still in SOAP 1.2? (Friday, 28 June)
• Re: encodingStyle is a list of URIs in Envelope Schema (Friday, 14 June)

Mark A. Jones

• differences between soap 1.1 and soap 1.2 (Friday, 28 June)

Mark Baker

• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 26 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Henrik's media type comments (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Correction; updated media type draft (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Henrik's media type comments (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Tuesday, 18 June)
• GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Administrivia (Monday, 17 June)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: Henrik's media type comments (Friday, 21 June)
• Re: Henrik's media type comments (Thursday, 20 June)

Martin Gudgin

• Re: Republishing SOAP 1.1 schemas (Tuesday, 4 June)
• Re: Root Attribute Still in SOAP 1.2? (Tuesday, 4 June)

Mike Dierken

• RE: GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Monday, 17 June)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: SOAP (Friday, 28 June)
• RE: Is whitespace significant in SOAP Messages? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Is whitespace significant in SOAP Messages? (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Processing Instructions and SOAP (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: Processing Instructions and SOAP (Tuesday, 18 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Friday, 14 June)
• RE: [getf] Node MUST process? (was: [GETF] okay, here's an updated draft with Henrik's option B) (Monday, 3 June)
• List of outstanding issues regarding the RPC proposal (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: [getf] Proposal for Web-friendly representation of RPC's in SOAP (Monday, 3 June)
• RE: [getf] Proposal for Web-friendly representation of RPC's in SOAP (Friday, 31 May)

Paul Prescod

• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Tuesday, 25 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Monday, 24 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)
• Re: Processing Instructions and SOAP (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: GET, conneg, and a media type parameter (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: Primer draft with GET Additions (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Monday, 17 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Primer draft with GET Additions (Sunday, 16 June)
• Administrivia (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Friday, 14 June)
• Re: Web-friendly SOAP (Friday, 14 June)
• Web-friendly SOAP (Friday, 14 June)

Ray Whitmer

• Re: Processing Instructions and SOAP (Tuesday, 18 June)

Sam Ruby

• Re: Primer draft with GET Additions (Tuesday, 18 June)
• Re: Primer draft with GET Additions (Sunday, 16 June)
• Re: Primer draft with GET Additions (Sunday, 16 June)

Simon Heaton

• SOAP v1.1: Using SOAP for RPC and return value (Wednesday, 19 June)

Walden Mathews

• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 26 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)
• RE: Web-friendly SOAP (Wednesday, 19 June)

webwiseus

• Does anyone know if there is a existing XML Schema for this application? (Wednesday, 19 June)

Last message date: Saturday, 29 June 2002 11:56:11 UTC