- From: Kevin Johnsrude <kevinj@roguewave.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:10:37 -0700
- To: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com]
> I believe the latest editors' draft of SOAP part 1 is clearer
> on this.
Thank you, Noah. Looking at the working draft at
http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.html
Are the following assertions the intended interpretation of the use case:
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope
xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/">
<SOAP-ENV:Body>
<m:GetLastTradePrice xmlns:m="Some-URI">
<symbol> DIS</symbol>
<color>
bright orange
</color>
</m:GetLastTradePrice>
</SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>
---------------------------------------------------------
The whitespace is NOT significant between:
the Envelope and Body start (end) tags and
the Body and the "GetLastTradePrice" start (end) tags
per Section 5:
"Element information items defined by this specification can have zero or
more character information item children whose character code is amongst the
whitespace characters as defined by [8]. Unless otherwise indicated, such
character information items are considered insignificant."
The whitespace IS significant between:
<m:GetLastTradePrice ...> and <symbol>
<symbol> and "DIS"
</symbol> and <color>
"color" start (end) tags and "bright orange"
"bright" and "orange"
</color> and </m:GetLastTradePrice>
per 5.3.1:
"All child element information items of the SOAP Body element information
item:
...
MAY have any number of character information item children. Child character
information items whose character code is amongst the whitespace characters
as defined by [8] are considered significant."
> Most likely, this text will appear in a formal working draft
> shortly. Hope this helps.
Thank you, Noah, it does. When will the next working draft be released? I
thought that the next draft might actually be a recommendation; is that no
longer the case?
Thanks,
Kevin Johnsrude
Rogue Wave Software, www.roguewave.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2002 15:14:42 UTC