- From: Kevin Johnsrude <kevinj@roguewave.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:10:37 -0700
- To: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] > I believe the latest editors' draft of SOAP part 1 is clearer > on this. Thank you, Noah. Looking at the working draft at http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.html Are the following assertions the intended interpretation of the use case: <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"> <SOAP-ENV:Body> <m:GetLastTradePrice xmlns:m="Some-URI"> <symbol> DIS</symbol> <color> bright orange </color> </m:GetLastTradePrice> </SOAP-ENV:Body> </SOAP-ENV:Envelope> --------------------------------------------------------- The whitespace is NOT significant between: the Envelope and Body start (end) tags and the Body and the "GetLastTradePrice" start (end) tags per Section 5: "Element information items defined by this specification can have zero or more character information item children whose character code is amongst the whitespace characters as defined by [8]. Unless otherwise indicated, such character information items are considered insignificant." The whitespace IS significant between: <m:GetLastTradePrice ...> and <symbol> <symbol> and "DIS" </symbol> and <color> "color" start (end) tags and "bright orange" "bright" and "orange" </color> and </m:GetLastTradePrice> per 5.3.1: "All child element information items of the SOAP Body element information item: ... MAY have any number of character information item children. Child character information items whose character code is amongst the whitespace characters as defined by [8] are considered significant." > Most likely, this text will appear in a formal working draft > shortly. Hope this helps. Thank you, Noah, it does. When will the next working draft be released? I thought that the next draft might actually be a recommendation; is that no longer the case? Thanks, Kevin Johnsrude Rogue Wave Software, www.roguewave.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2002 15:14:42 UTC