W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Henrik's media type comments

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:23:13 -0700
Message-ID: <00b101c218db$5bdba160$8f01a8c0@MNOTLAPTOP>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Hi Mark!

> > I haven't kept current with the twisted state of SOAPAction, but I
> > find reference to it in Adjuncts (except an indirect reference to
> > "parameters" in the media type registration), and the change notes
> > indicate it's been removed to the I-D. There seems to be a missing
> > here; does SOAPAction need to be exposed as a property?
> If you mean as a media type parameter, then yes, that's what we agreed
> in the WG.

I mean, if SOAPAction is something that implementations need to know about
and manipulate (i.e., senders need to specify the value), shouldn't it be
exposed as an abstract property (i.e., have a URI)?

> Remind me what you edited again? 8-)  I'll update your details.

Heh. Seriously, I have no objection if you drop me off.

> Congrats on the move to BEA!  Raise hell. 8-)

Thanks. Hell is on my todo list.
Received on Friday, 21 June 2002 00:23:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:11:50 UTC