- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:23:13 -0700
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Hi Mark! > > I haven't kept current with the twisted state of SOAPAction, but I can't > > find reference to it in Adjuncts (except an indirect reference to > > "parameters" in the media type registration), and the change notes > > indicate it's been removed to the I-D. There seems to be a missing link > > here; does SOAPAction need to be exposed as a property? > > If you mean as a media type parameter, then yes, that's what we agreed > in the WG. I mean, if SOAPAction is something that implementations need to know about and manipulate (i.e., senders need to specify the value), shouldn't it be exposed as an abstract property (i.e., have a URI)? > Remind me what you edited again? 8-) I'll update your details. Heh. Seriously, I have no objection if you drop me off. > Congrats on the move to BEA! Raise hell. 8-) Thanks. Hell is on my todo list.
Received on Friday, 21 June 2002 00:23:15 UTC