www-tag@w3.org from September 2003 by author

Aaron Swartz

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Sunday, 21 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Sunday, 21 September)

Addison Phillips [wM]

• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Monday, 22 September)

Bjoern Hoehrmann

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Monday, 15 September)

Bullard, Claude L (Len)

• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (review of some t erms) (Monday, 29 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Friday, 26 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Friday, 26 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Friday, 26 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Friday, 26 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Thursday, 25 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Thursday, 25 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Wednesday, 24 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Wednesday, 24 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Wednesday, 24 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Wednesday, 24 September)
• RE: Revised TAG finding: '"Deep Linking" in the World Wide Web' (Friday, 12 September)

C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Thursday, 18 September)

Chris Lilley

• Fwd: Re: Form submission when successful controls contain characters outside the submission character set (Thursday, 11 September)

Christoph Schneegans

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Thursday, 18 September)

Dan Brickley

• Re: new TAG issue: rdfURIMeaning-39 (Wednesday, 3 September)

Dan Connolly

• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (review of some terms) (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (psbook hardcopy form) (Friday, 26 September)
• Schema component designators (re rdfmsQnameUriMapping-6, 37) (Wednesday, 24 September)
• RE: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft (UML, OWL/RDFS) (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: WhenToUseGet-7 comments (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: WhenToUseGet-7 comments (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Monday, 15 September)
• new TAG issue: rdfURIMeaning-39 (Wednesday, 3 September)

David Orchard

• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Monday, 29 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Friday, 26 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Friday, 26 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Tuesday, 23 September)
• RE: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft (Saturday, 20 September)
• RE: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft (Friday, 19 September)
• Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft (Friday, 19 September)
• RE: WhenToUseGet-7 comments (Wednesday, 17 September)
• RE: WhenToUseGet-7 comments (Wednesday, 17 September)
• WhenToUseGet-7 comments (Monday, 15 September)

Eamonn Neylon

• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? (Thursday, 4 September)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Sunday, 21 September)

Francois Yergeau

• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Thursday, 18 September)
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Wednesday, 17 September)
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Wednesday, 17 September)

François Yergeau

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)

Gavin Thomas Nicol

• Re: Form submission when successful controls contain characters outside the submission character set (Thursday, 11 September)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? (Thursday, 18 September)

Hammond, Tony (ELSLON)

• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? (Saturday, 6 September)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (review of some terms) (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• [Minutes] 29 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, mtg planning) (Monday, 29 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Friday, 26 September)
• Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Friday, 26 September)
• [Agenda] 29 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, meeting planning) (Thursday, 25 September)
• [Fwd: Re: Updated finding: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST"] (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Accepted TAG finding: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST" (Monday, 22 September)
• Canceled: 22 Sep 2003 TAG teleconference (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)
• Updated finding: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST (Friday, 19 September)
• [Agenda] 22 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, Findings) (Thursday, 18 September)
• Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Thursday, 18 September)
• RE: WhenToUseGet-7 comments (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: WhenToUseGet-7 comments (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Summary of TAG activity from 10 Aug to 10 Sep 2003 (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Updated finding: "URIs, Addressability, and the use of HTTP GET and POST" (Tuesday, 16 September)
• [Minutes] 15 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (namespaceDocument-8, deepLinking-25, whenToUseGet-7, contentTypeOverride-29) (Monday, 15 September)
• Re: [Minutes] 8 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, charmodReview-17, namespaceDocument-8, versioning/extensibility) (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Agenda] 15 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (namespaceDocument-8, Findings) (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Agenda] 15 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (namespaceDocument-8, Findings) (Thursday, 11 September)
• Revised TAG finding: '"Deep Linking" in the World Wide Web' (Thursday, 11 September)
• [Minutes] 8 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, charmodReview-17, namespaceDocument-8, versioning/extensibility) (Wednesday, 10 September)
• Re: TAG telcon 18Aug: IRC record (Friday, 5 September)
• [Agenda] 8 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg. sched, deliv. sched., namespaceDocument-8, Versioning/Extensibility) (Friday, 5 September)

jalgermissen@topicmapping.com

• Re: Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)

Joern Clausen

• Re: Use of metadata in URIs (Monday, 29 September)

John Cowan

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Wednesday, 17 September)

Jonathan Borden

• Re: New RDDL draft (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Monday, 15 September)
• rdfURIMeaning-39] Fwd: Re: Hidden triples and self-description (Saturday, 13 September)

Joshua Allen

• RE: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Tuesday, 23 September)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Monday, 22 September)

Kay, Michael

• RE: Revised TAG finding: '"Deep Linking" in the World Wide Web' (Friday, 12 September)

Larry Masinter

• RE: Use of metadata in URIs (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Use of metadata in URIs (Sunday, 28 September)
• RE: WhenToUseGet-7 comments (Friday, 19 September)

Mark Baker

• RFC 2119 & point categorization (Saturday, 27 September)
• Re: whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET (Wednesday, 17 September)
• whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? (Wednesday, 3 September)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: What CNN thinks the Web Is (Saturday, 13 September)

Martin Duerst

• AddDefaultCharset considered harmful (Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Monday, 22 September)
• Comments on mime-respect (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Thursday, 18 September)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Basics of XML Schema inheritance (Friday, 12 September)

Massimo Marchiori

• RE: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)

MURATA Makoto

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Sunday, 21 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Sunday, 21 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Sunday, 21 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Saturday, 20 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Action: Redraft 4.10.2 to include some good practice notes (Wednesday, 3 September)
• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? (Wednesday, 3 September)

Norman Walsh

• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)
• Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Sunday, 21 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Friday, 19 September)
• Versioning and extensibility (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Action: Rewrite para 4 of 4.10.4. (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Action: Rewrite para 4 of 4.10.4. (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Action: Redraft 4.10.2 to include some good practice notes (Wednesday, 3 September)

Olivier Fehr

• Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (review of some terms) (Monday, 29 September)
• RE: Use of metadata in URIs (Monday, 29 September)

Ossi Nykänen

• RE: Liberal "URI assignment policies" will create confusion? (Thursday, 18 September)
• Liberal "URI assignment policies" will create confusion? (Wednesday, 17 September)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Thursday, 25 September)

Paul Cotton

• RE: Re: Form submission when successful controls contain characters outside the submission character set (Thursday, 11 September)

Rao, Rajesh

• Basics of XML Schema inheritance (Friday, 12 September)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: [Minutes] 29 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (Arch Doc, mtg planning) (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Arch Doc: 18 Sep: status (Tuesday, 23 September)
• Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Comments on 18 September 2003 editors draft (Saturday, 20 September)
• noodling on contentTypeOverride-29 (Tuesday, 16 September)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Friday, 26 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Monday, 15 September)
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Sunday, 14 September)

Simon St.Laurent

• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Monday, 22 September)
• RE: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Thursday, 18 September)

Stefano Mazzocchi

• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Sunday, 14 September)
• The lost meaning of the HTTP protocol in URIs (Saturday, 13 September)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 18 Sep: abstract (Wednesday, 24 September)

Tim Bray

• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Tuesday, 30 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Monday, 29 September)
• Re: AddDefaultCharset considered harmful (Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023) (Thursday, 25 September)
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Wednesday, 24 September)
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Friday, 19 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Thursday, 18 September)
• Re: Can we revise RFC3023? (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: Requesting a revision of RFC3023 (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Re: whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET (Wednesday, 17 September)
• Can we revise RFC3023? (Tuesday, 16 September)
• New RDDL draft (Monday, 15 September)
• Re: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? (Thursday, 4 September)
• Re: Action: Rewrite para 4 of 4.10.4. (Wednesday, 3 September)
• Re: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? (Wednesday, 3 September)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: Use of metadata in URIs (Tuesday, 30 September)
• RE: Arch Doc: 26 September 2003 Editor's Draft (Monday, 29 September)
• RE: Use of metadata in URIs (Monday, 29 September)
• RE: Opacity and mailto: in conflict (Monday, 22 September)
• Arch Doc: 18th September 2003 Editors Draft (Sunday, 21 September)
• RE: Liberal "URI assignment policies" will create confusion? (Thursday, 18 September)
• RE: Liberal "URI assignment policies" will create confusion? (Wednesday, 17 September)
• RE: whenToUseGet-7: How to use GET (Wednesday, 17 September)
• RE: [Minutes] 8 Sep 2003 TAG teleconf (mtg planning, charmodRevie w-17, namespaceDocument-8, versioning/extensibility) (Thursday, 11 September)
• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? (Thursday, 4 September)
• RE: The OpenURL - A Distinguished URI? (Wednesday, 3 September)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 September 2003 17:50:48 UTC