> Huh? Resources are indeed connected by hypertext links, but *also*, > you are saying, by "descriptive metadata"? I may not understand what > you mean but I think I disagree with what this actually says. We > could either (a) try to find something else to say about metadata or > (b) just stop after the word "links", losing "and descriptive > metadata". For example, <foo xmlns="http://www.tbray.org/"> is descriptive metadata, not a hypertext link. The reason I didn't say just "links" instead of "hypertext links and descriptive metadata" is because the latter makes people think a little harder rather than assuming all links are hyperlinks. ....RoyReceived on Monday, 29 September 2003 19:28:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:01 UTC