W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2003

WhenToUseGet-7 comments

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:45:16 -0700
To: <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003901c37bb9$82242940$fe2b000a@beasys.com>

At the end of the draft finding, it says "Section 3 WSDL 1.2 Bindings [WSDL]
provides a binding to HTTP GET, which makes it possible to respect the
principle of using GET for safe operations. However, to represent safety in
a more straightforward manner, it should be a property of operations
themselves, not just a feature of bindings.".

I'm not quite sure what this means.  Does this suggest that there should be
a general property of operations that specifies safetey, which could then be
bound to POST?  That is a operation declarated safe could be bound to POST?
I think that's the right interpretation, in which case I'm comfortable with
the wording.

Interestingly, I just heard the need from 2 customers last week who want to
be able to have a "ping" function to test the availability of a service.

At this point, I don't think the WSDL WG has accepted this requirement.  The
editors copy of the requirements document (last updated feb 2003), has
requirement R125 as the only TAG sourced requirement.
The normative description of the InterfaceBinding for SOAP 1.2 MUST support
the SOAP 1.2 MEP for HTTP GET in and HTTP SOAP out. (From TAG. Last
discussed 26 Sep 2002.)

I propose to ask them for some clarification and call the finding to their

Received on Monday, 15 September 2003 14:48:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:00 UTC