- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:35:20 -0500
- To: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@apache.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: 'Tim Berners-Lee' <timbl@w3.org>, "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Then be patient. This isn't a trivial document and these are not trivial terms. Why is a term from the field of visualization of topical clustering introduced into a document describing the web architecture? Provide the definition for the abstraction so the scope is clear. len -----Original Message----- From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@apache.org] Sandro, they are two topics: one is the space, the other is visualizing that space. That page says it is talking about maps of information spaces. That is just like the AAA handing out maps of physical roads, though a bit harder to visualize because the geography isn't forced into a mostly-flat-spherical plane. The relations within and between information create a space. This *is* a common term in the area of Web architecture and it should be used when appropriate. Please, can we just be a tad less oversensitive about ontologies on this list? Half the time I can't carry on even the most trivial conversations with other TAG members without being interrupted.
Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 09:35:45 UTC