- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:55:14 +0300
- To: ext Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@apache.org>
- Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
> On Tuesday, Sep 23, 2003, at 00:19 Europe/London, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > >> + A resource is considered to be "on the Web" if it can be >> independently >> + referred to by at least one Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), even >> if >> +access to that resource is restricted. I think it is important to also require that, for a resource to be on the web, that it be intended (though not garunteed) that the URI used to denote the resource is resolvable to one or more representations. I.e., simply using any arbitrary URI to denote a resource does not mean that that resource is "on the web" as the URI in question may not be meaningful to any protocol available for resolution to a representation. C.f. the thread beginning with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0172.html Cheers, Patrick
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2003 03:55:23 UTC