w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org from December 1996 by author

Alex Milowski

• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Sunday, 29 December)
• An example of socats and nsgmls (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Saturday, 14 December)

Bill Smith

• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)

Charles F. Goldfarb

• Re: Summary of New HyTime Features in the TC (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Formal System Identifiers (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: FPI's in NOTATION declarations (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: FPIs (Sunday, 1 December)

Christopher R. Maden

• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Blended Proposal (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Blended Proposal (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: XML and HTML Interoperability (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: MIME type for XML (Monday, 2 December)

Dave Peterson

• Re: SDATA, again (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: SGML and XML (Saturday, 7 December)

David Durand

• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: re ERB discussion of public identifiers (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: SPREAD public entity set for ISO 10646 (Re: SDATA, again) (Wednesday, 11 December)

David G. Durand

• Re:Can we be more concrete... (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Tuesday, 31 December)
• BOS confusion (analysis; suggestion to resolve Newcomb/Bryan conflict) (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: Suggestion: A link model (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: Suggestion: A link model (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Monday, 30 December)
• Grove plans? (Monday, 30 December)
• Link Behaviors (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Suggestion: A link model (Monday, 30 December)
• More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Sunday, 29 December)
• Suggestion: A link model (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Thursday, 26 December)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Thursday, 26 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 4. link behavior (incl new: 4.3) (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: (1. Background) (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 5. link roles (Friday, 20 December)
• Hyperlink behavior (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Another proposal, and a requirement (was Re: Trying to sum up a bit) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Apology (was Re: Parsing technology) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Parsing technology (was Re: Grosso whitespace proposal) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Another requirement qualification. (*Not* a proposal, please read!) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Attempt at listing requirements, constraints and proposal fragments (Sunday, 15 December)
• Things we should not forget... (Saturday, 14 December)
• Whitespace details (Friday, 13 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• RS/RE: Decision point? (Friday, 13 December)
• Musing on the philosophy of FPIs (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Thursday, 12 December)
• comments (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Public IDs for notations in XML (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• SDATA, again (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs (Friday, 6 December)
• RE: FPIs to URNs (Thursday, 5 December)
• Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: SGML and XML (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: SGML and XML (Monday, 2 December)

David J Birnbaum

• Re: SDATA, again (Monday, 9 December)

Deborah A. Lapeyre

• Re: SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Friday, 6 December)
• FPIs (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• RE: Simple solution? Pub. Idents. vs URN. (Monday, 2 December)

Derek Denny-Brown

• locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (quite sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)

Digitome Ltd.

• Re:Can we be more concrete... (Tuesday, 31 December)

Eve L. Maler

• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 11 December)

Eve Maler

• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)

Gavin Nicol

• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: Link Behaviors (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Richer & richer semantics? (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Hyperlink behavior (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Transclusion (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Hyperlink behavior (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: MPRDV (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Monday, 16 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Monday, 16 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: XML and HTML Interoperability (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: MIME type for XML (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: MIME type for XML (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: SGML and XML (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup (Monday, 2 December)

James Clark

• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Sunday, 29 December)

Jean Paoli

• RE: Understanding the Paoli proposal (Saturday, 14 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Saturday, 14 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Saturday, 14 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)

Joe English

• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Monday, 30 December)
• Element vs. mixed content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Monday, 16 December)
• Element vs. mixed content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Thursday, 12 December)

Jon Bosak

• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Thursday, 26 December)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Thursday, 26 December)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Thursday, 26 December)
• clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Thursday, 26 December)
• Anchor terminology (Thursday, 26 December)
• HTML vs. XML arguments, relevance of (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: (1. Background) (Friday, 20 December)
• Mail test -- please ignore (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Things we should not forget... (Sunday, 15 December)
• XML papers at WWW6 (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: XML and HTML Interoperability (Thursday, 12 December)
• XML in Seybold (Tuesday, 10 December)
• SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Monday, 9 December)
• An application of FPIs (Monday, 9 December)
• [rdaniel@acl.lanl.gov: Re: FPIs to URNs] (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Tuesday, 3 December)
• FPIs to URNs (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Stylesheets (Monday, 2 December)
• New members; archives updated (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: FPIs (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: FPIs (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: MIME type for XML (Sunday, 1 December)
• Re: Revised XML registration (Sunday, 1 December)

Keith M. Corbett

• Re: Richer & richer semantics? (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Wednesday, 11 December)

Ken Holman

• RE: Public IDs for notations in XML (Thursday, 12 December)
• RE: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Wednesday, 11 December)
• RE: FPIs to URNs (Thursday, 5 December)
• Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs (Tuesday, 3 December)
• RE: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup (Monday, 2 December)
• RE: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)

lee@sq.com

• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: comments (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Public IDs for notations in XML (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Monday, 9 December)
• RE: FPIs to URNs (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: MIME type for XML (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup (Monday, 2 December)

len bullard

• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Link Behaviors (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? [was Anchors Aweigh] (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Friday, 27 December)
• Anchors Aweigh (Thursday, 26 December)
• Re: Transclusion (Sunday, 22 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: MPRDV (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: Public IDs for notations in XML (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: Public IDs for notations in XML (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup (Tuesday, 3 December)

Lou Burnard

• Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness (Saturday, 28 December)

Martin Bryan

• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Monday, 30 December)
• Kill the BOS of XML (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Friday, 27 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Tuesday, 24 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: MPRDV (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs (Tuesday, 3 December)

Michael Sperberg-McQueen

• Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness (Thursday, 26 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. (Friday, 20 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Friday, 13 December)
• simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: SGML and XML (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: SGML and XML (Sunday, 1 December)

Murray Altheim

• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Whitespace details (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Wednesday, 11 December)
• XML and HTML Interoperability (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: MIME type for XML (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: MIME type for XML (Monday, 2 December)

Norbert H. MIKULA

• Problems with WD-xml-961114 (productions) (Monday, 30 December)

papresco

• Re: Richer & richer semantics? (Tuesday, 24 December)
• Re: Richer & richer semantics? (Sunday, 22 December)

Paul Grosso

• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Parsing technology (was Re: Grosso whitespace proposal) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Grosso whitespace proposal (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Grosso whitespace proposal (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: simplifying comments in SGML '97 (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)

Paul Prescod

• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Blended Proposal (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Grosso whitespace proposal (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: XML and stylesheets (Sunday, 15 December)
• XML and stylesheets (Sunday, 15 December)
• RE: Understanding the Paoli proposal (Sunday, 15 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Saturday, 14 December)
• Understanding the Paoli proposal (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re Delenda est summary (Saturday, 14 December)
• Whitespace and full-text indexers (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)
• public identifiers: "interchange XML" (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Wednesday, 11 December)
• RS/RE Delenda Est compromise? (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Friday, 6 December)
• RE: FPIs to URNs (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Thursday, 5 December)
• Straw-man XML Support for PUBLIC Identifiers and XML Catalogs (Tuesday, 3 December)
• Re: Fried Parrot Intestines in my XML Soup (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Formal System Identifiers (Sunday, 1 December)

Per-Ake Ling UAB/K/U

• Stylesheets (Monday, 2 December)

Peter Flynn

• Re: Anchor terminology (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Thursday, 26 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Transclusion (Sunday, 22 December)
• Re: Hyperlink behavior (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Monday, 16 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Monday, 16 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: XML and stylesheets (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: XML and stylesheets (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: re ERB discussion of public identifiers (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: Understanding the Paoli proposal (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: re ERB discussion of public identifiers (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: ERB discussion of public identifiers (Wednesday, 11 December)

Ralph Ferris

• Re: Anchor terminology (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Saturday, 28 December)

Rick Jelliffe

• SPREAD public entity set for ISO 10646 (Re: SDATA, again) (Wednesday, 11 December)

Robin Cover

• XML and groves/property sets (Saturday, 28 December)

Ron Daniel

• Re: FPIs to URNs (Thursday, 5 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)
• Re: FPIs to URNs (Wednesday, 4 December)

Steven R. Newcomb

• Re: BOS clarification? (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Sunday, 29 December)
• unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Sunday, 22 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Sunday, 22 December)
• anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Saturday, 21 December)

streich@austin.sar.slb.com

• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Thursday, 12 December)

Terry Allen

• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• BOS clarification? (Monday, 30 December)
• Policy in XML (concrete) (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Sunday, 29 December)
• URLs/MIME only? [was Anchors Aweigh] (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: unmarked linkend awareness by XML engines (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Transclusion (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Transclusion (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Richer & richer semantics? (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: re ERB discussion of public identifiers (Sunday, 15 December)
• Re: Public IDs for notations in XML (Saturday, 14 December)
• re ERB discussion of public identifiers (Saturday, 14 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Tuesday, 10 December)
• Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: MIME type for XML (Tuesday, 3 December)
• FPIs in XML (Monday, 2 December)
• Re: Client-side-resolved Indirection (Monday, 2 December)
• Characters in XML (Sunday, 1 December)

Tim Bray

• Can we be more concrete? (Sunday, 29 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Sunday, 22 December)
• Transclusion (Saturday, 21 December)
• Richer & richer semantics? (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: MPRDV (Friday, 20 December)
• Hyperlinks: MPRDV (Friday, 20 December)
• ERB decisions on RS/RE and whitespace (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Re: Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Trying to sum up a bit (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Maximimum line lengths (Monday, 16 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• RE: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Friday, 13 December)
• Please please please (Wednesday, 11 December)
• ERB discussion of public identifiers (Wednesday, 11 December)
• RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 11 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Monday, 9 December)
• Public Identifiers (Monday, 9 December)

W. Eliot Kimber

• Re: URLs/MIME only? (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re:Can we be more concrete... (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Tuesday, 31 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Suggestion: A link model (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: BOS clarification? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Suggestion: A link model (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: More proposals -- and some critical implementation issues (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Can we be more concrete? (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Suggestion: A link model (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Suggestion: A link model (Monday, 30 December)
• Re: Anchors Aweigh (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: Anchor terminology (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: clink/ilink direction (Was: anchor awareness) (Saturday, 28 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Tuesday, 24 December)
• Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: locating capabilities vs. anchor awareness (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: Summary of New HyTime Features in the TC (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Monday, 23 December)
• Re: anchor awareness (was Re: Richer & richer semantics?) (Sunday, 22 December)
• Re: Richer & richer semantics? (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. (Saturday, 21 December)
• Re: Hyperlinks: 3.3, agree with Martin; new req. 3.4, self-revealing links. (Friday, 20 December)
• Summary of New HyTime Features in the TC (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: Hyperlink behavior (Friday, 20 December)
• Re: RS/RE, again (sorry) (Wednesday, 18 December)
• Re: Mixed vs. element content (Was Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)) (Tuesday, 17 December)
• Public IDs for notations in XML (Thursday, 12 December)
• Re: SDATA, again (Monday, 9 December)
• Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Friday, 6 December)
• Re: Resolution != Naming (was RE: FPIs to URNs) (Friday, 6 December)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 December 1996 19:08:36 UTC