- From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 11:35:02 -0600
- To: "David G. Durand" <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
David G. Durand wrote: > > As far as I can tell, we need query functions, and the ability to specify a > few behaviors: Yes. > Offer choice of options (menu or list as appropriate to display device) > transclude content PickOne. PickMany. (someone near MID group will remember why the Logo, "more meta than thou" was used). '=) > navigate, replacing current document, goto > navigate, creating a new display area (as appropriate to display device) spawn - do it, then it is the framework's problem > Highlight linkend (since it may not be in the markup, this cannot be > part of normal rendering) > > Can anyone think of any other link behavior we need? gosub - navigate, do what you do, return here It is convenient to be able to specify a chain: an entry point which is fixed for sequences of instructions. In MID, we used an element type and that may be best left as an application convention. >> Proposals are needed. > And starting, I think. Yes. Looking good. > > To get the credibility needed for acceptance, > >not only the spec, but appendices on implementation and/or working > >code will be needed. > > I have not seen any suggestion that is remotely problematic enough to > necessitate this yet. It may happen, but not yet. I keep it in mind because I haven't experienced a successful project of this type that didn't need it. We tend to forget that even with our individual differences, we know a lot we assume others know. Having seen that error before, I've learned the value of the point and click proof. API appendices make it explicit what is always expected of a language handler. Given that XML is a metanotation, is this needed? An API is also a data declaration of function/message calls. Is it the case that defining a standard XML handler is a separate effort from XML-the-language? Is it the case that several groups may undertake this as a standards effort with the usual ensuing lack of interoperability? len
Received on Monday, 30 December 1996 12:35:11 UTC