W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > December 1996

Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)

From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 22:59:57 -0800
Message-Id: <199612170659.WAA06249@boethius.eng.sun.com>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
CC: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM
[Chris Maden:]

| 3) A dichotomy between "DTD-ful" and DTD-less parsing will make any
|    sibling-based relationship difficult at best; this will affect some
|    TEI or HyQ based hyperlinks, as well as sibling-based stylistic
|    decisions.

Sorry to be so slow here, but what's the connection with sibling
relationships?  My idea of a well-formed XML document is one for which
there is just one possible tree structure; what's different about
sibling relationships if a DTD is provided?

Received on Tuesday, 17 December 1996 02:02:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:05 UTC