W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > December 1996

Re: RS/RE, again (sorry)

From: Jon Bosak <bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 18:24:43 -0800
Message-Id: <199612180224.SAA06890@boethius.eng.sun.com>
To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
CC: bosak@atlantic-83.Eng.Sun.COM
[Chris Maden, summarizing a number of replies to my question:]

| TEI and, I believe, HyQ, use sibling relationships for addressing;
| e.g., start at the element whose SGML ID is "foo" and traverse three
| nodes to the right.
| If DTD-less parsing creates spurious CDATA nodes, then the target of
| an address can be different from that for a DTD-ful parse.

What this seems to add up to is that treeloc uses a different way of
thinking about what a sibling is than I do.  Frankly, I like my way
better.  I can see where defining pseudo-elements as nodes could be
useful in addressing arbitrary spans of text, but if the price for
resolving our problem is that the only elements that I can address in
XML are the real ones, then that is a price I would be willing to pay.

Received on Wednesday, 18 December 1996 06:38:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:05 UTC