- From: Terry Allen <tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 11:47:37 -0800 (PST)
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
I'm having trouble matching up what Eliot and Steve are saying about BOS with what I know from the 1992 version of 10744, section 6.2.4.2. In part: A bounded object set can be determined authomatically by the HT engine by constructing an "entity tree", starting with the SGML doc entity of the hub doc as the root. The entity tree includes external entities declared in the hub doc, then external entities declared in those entities, and so on. ... A limit can be placed on the depth of the entity tree by the "bounding level" att of the hub document. ... Does this not mean that every external entity declared in the hub doc (and every external entity in those entities) is part of the BOS? And might it not be the case that I declare as entities in my hub doc certain public text (part of the US Constitution, for example) that are not part of my copyrighted intellectual property? (I might declare them for the use of links that refer or traverse to them, rather than for transclusion.) The bounding level att works only when my work happens to end at the same level throughout, so appears not to be a solution. So isn't BOS applicable to the problem of defining the extent of my intellectual property/literary work only if I can contrive not to declare as external entities anything that doesn't belong to the work? Regards, Terry Allen Fujitsu Software Corp. tallen@fsc.fujitsu.com "In going on with these experiments, how many pretty systems do we build, which we soon find outselves obliged to destroy?" - Benjamin Franklin A Davenport Group Sponsor: http://www.ora.com/davenport/index.html
Received on Monday, 30 December 1996 14:49:07 UTC