- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 1996 08:43:33 -0500
- To: dgd@cs.bu.edu
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
>I take the point, but given that I think the arguments against SDATA are >specious, I feel compelled to drag us through the damn thing one more time. >We don't have to pick an optimal solution to significantly improve XML, in >this case; we don't lose compatibility with SGML as defined, and actually >retain it with SGML as practiced. I agree with David here. Even though there are other ways of doing much the same thing, I favor SDATA over all alternatives, and it doesn't cost much to add it to the XML spec.
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 1996 08:45:32 UTC