- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 1996 23:55:27 -0500
- To: dgd@cs.bu.edu
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
David writes: >So, given that, I propose for discussion: > >XML linking architecture is indicated by an attribute: > >-XML-ARCH-LINK > >We have AFs something like this: > ><!attlist (whatever) -XML-ARCH-LINK (none | clink | ilink | location) "none"> Playing the devil's advocate.... Assuming that link behaviour *will* be put out into stylesheets, we must ask if we need any fixed forms at all (ie. the sylesheet can decide what comprises a link, and what does not, and what the structure of a link definition needs to be in order to be semantically interpretable). I would say that for interoperability would be the main benefit.
Received on Monday, 30 December 1996 23:57:16 UTC