- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 23:11:27 -0500
- To: papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
- CC: murray@spyglass.com, tbray@textuality.com, w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
>Isn't XML supposed to be compatible with SGML? If you can define "compatible with SGML" given the syntactical variance caused by the use of various features, we might be somewhere further along. My real point is that we are *already* invoking features that are not altogether widely supported in order to make the syntax of XML slightly more pleasant. Different whitespace handling is just one more...
Received on Tuesday, 17 December 1996 23:14:01 UTC