- From: Gavin Nicol <gtn@ebt.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Dec 1996 12:13:43 -0500
- To: eliot@isogen.com
- CC: dgd@cs.bu.edu, w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
>The only problem with this approach is the same one HyTime and DSSSL faced: >what objects make up the nodes of the tree you're addressing. We currently >have three different tree views of SGML documents in established specs: > >1. DSSSL default grove plan: characters and elements are children of elements >2. HyTime default grove plan: pelements and elements are children of elements >3. TEI implicit grove plan: elements only are children of elements > >Nothing in the first URL shown above indicates which of these three tree >views are to be used. You would either need a way to indicate the grove >plan or require the use of a single grove plan, which would somewhat limit >the utility of the scheme, but maybe not fatally. In the very early versions of DynaWeb, I included support for these types of URL (and in fact, we also supported combinations of typed/untyped). I used (2) from the above list, and it seemed a reasonable choice.
Received on Tuesday, 31 December 1996 12:16:10 UTC