- From: Paul Grosso <paul@arbortext.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 96 13:12:22 CST
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
> From: dgd@cs.bu.edu (David Durand) > > I will remind people that the argument for changing comments is not > simply that "ASCII em-dash" is a useful punctuation mark -- though that > is certainly true -- but that the restriction has no justification in > terms of XML. The only good thing about the current definition is that > I expect most XML implementors won't care about SGML compatibility and > will skip implementing this "feature", or at least make it optional. . . Hello! I expect most XML implementors *are* the SGML vendors. Look at this working group and ERB. I do not believe you do anyone a service by making "we/they" sorts of comments about XML/SGML. paul Paul Grosso VP Research, ArborText, Inc. and Chief Technical Officer, SGML Open Email: paul@arbortext.com
Received on Monday, 16 December 1996 14:22:55 UTC