- From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
- Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 18:40:20 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
I think that the fundamental problem we are encountering is that many want to use XML internally (within an organization, or even a widely flung community) but others want every XML document to be exactly as useful on every computer on the Internet as on every other computer. We've run into this before. Processing instructions can also "favor" one machine or system over another. So can variant character set encodings. Do we want to make an explicit distinction between "exchange XML" (UTF-8/UCS2, no PIs, URLs) and "archive XML?" (which would allow that stuff) Would this solve people's problems? And if not, why can't we resolve public identifiers the same way we resolved those other questions: in favor of end-user flexibility. Compared to the potential havoc caused by shipping shift-JIS documents across the web encoded using PIs instead of elements, public identifiers are quite harmless. They are trivial to ignore and are easy to use redundantly with URLs. Paul Prescod
Received on Wednesday, 11 December 1996 18:41:39 UTC