- From: W. Eliot Kimber <eliot@isogen.com>
- Date: Sun, 29 Dec 1996 21:05:15 -0900
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@www10.w3.org
- Cc: goldfarb@alink.net
I wrote: >3. A way to represent the relations between the regions of the graphic > and the data: HyTime-style hyperlinks, of course. [I say HyTime-style > because it doesn't matter whether they actually conform to HyTime or > not for the purposes of this discussion, but it happens that my > design does conform]. I see that this isn't quite fair to TEI--a closer study of the actual TEI spec (section 14) shows that TEI has a Link element distinct from XREF that is essentially the same as a HyTime ilink. However, unless I've missed something (quite likely, given the lateness of the hour), it doesn't appear that TEI has an exact equivalent of HyTime's clink (although maybe Link can be used in that way?). Note that except for the doc/to/from on TEI's XRef vs one addressing attribute on HyTime's clink, TEI's approach and HyTime's are very similar, at least at the level of raw syntax: both provide mechanisms for indirect addressing from separate linking elements using plain ID references. In fact, I'd argue that, when combined with TEI extended pointers as a query notation, HyTime's design is slightly more convenient because you can use extended pointers directly from independent links without going through indirection if you don't otherwise need it--but that's a quibble and something TEI could add quite easily if it wanted to--in any case, this isn't a TEI vs. HyTime debate. In fact, I would hazzard to guess that there is in fact so little difference between HyTime and TEI on the issues of linking that TEI could be defined as entirely HyTime conforming (including the use of TEI extended pointers as a query notation, which is what they are anyway) with little or no change to its current core definition. This suggests that both designs are either fundamentally sound or equally flawed, and I don't think they are flawed in their fundamental approach to linking and addressing. Cheers, E. -- W. Eliot Kimber (eliot@isogen.com) Senior SGML Consulting Engineer, Highland Consulting 2200 North Lamar Street, Suite 230, Dallas, Texas 75202 +1-214-953-0004 +1-214-953-3152 fax http://www.isogen.com (work) http://www.drmacro.com (home) "Rats in the morning, rats in the afternoon...if they don't go away, I'll be re-educated soon..." --Austin Lounge Lizards, "1984 Blues"
Received on Sunday, 29 December 1996 23:07:20 UTC