- From: Michael Sperberg-McQueen <U35395@UICVM.UIC.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 96 08:47:25 CST
- To: W3C SGML Working Group <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 9 Dec 1996 10:36:14 -0500 David G. Durand said: > I would like to repreat my appeal that we revisit the >SDATA decision. I'm sure that no extended rationale was >presented for the decision, and I've been unable to find a >record of it at all. As XML stands we have the private use The second half of October was, if I remember correctly, given over largely though not exclusively to the discussion of this question. There seems little point in my contributing to this discussion now, since what I contributed then (I thought they were extended discussions, and they certainly described the rationale for the ERB decision) seems not only not to have persuaded David, but to have been invisible to him. So I'll just ask David to follow the obvious guideline: if you failed to persuade everyone that SDATA is worth having in the spec the first time around, and now want to raise the question again, can you please provide some new arguments? The old arguments have been read, and understood, and discussed. David thinks, I suspect, that I didn't understand his arguments, but understanding is not the same as agreement. His arguments didn't persuade me then, and I for one have enough other things on my plate not to want to discuss an issue for the third time, when nothing new has been added to the discussion. In all the cases I know of where SDATA entities now work without user intervention, the SDATA entities are known characters which occur in Unicode. In cases where non-Unicode characters are successfully handled, all the cases I know of involve user intervention in the application's character tables. Removing SDATA entities does not change this state of affairs one whit: known characters will work, and others will require user intervention. The problem of characters not known to an application is a real and serious one. I'd like to see some discussion of how to solve it, rather than further special pleading for SDATA, which seems to me to be a band-aid for the problem, not a solution to it. We need a real solution, not a band-aid, and I am not convinced that SDATA is even a part of a real solution. Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Received on Tuesday, 10 December 1996 10:09:11 UTC